Trial Finally Begins in Horrific ‘Puppy Doe’ Abuse Case

UPDATE: Radoslaw Czerkawski was found guilty of all 12 charges of animal cruelty and sentenced to eight to 10 years in prison.

As I wrote on this blog back in 2014, one of the most horrific and disturbing animal abuse cases I’d ever written about was that of a young Pit Bull called Puppy Doe. Four years later, this still remains true. And now, finally, there may soon be justice for this tortured puppy. The trial of her alleged abuser, Radoslaw Czerkawski, began today in Dedham, Mass.

If you’re unfamiliar with the sad tale of Puppy Doe, here’s her story. When she was known as Kiya, her original owners gave her away via a Craigslist ad when their landlord decided to ban Pit Bulls due to high insurance rates. Kiya eventually ended up with Radoslaw Czerkawski, who allegedly starved her and inflicted what the Boston Herald called “medieval-style torture” on the helpless dog. This monster systematically pulled her joints apart, split her tongue in half, stabbed her in the eye and burned her.

Czerkawski, a Polish national living illegally in the U.S. on an expired work visa, was the live-in caretaker for an elderly woman with dementia in Quincy, Mass. When the woman died in late August 2013, Czerkawski dumped Kiya in a nearby wooded area. She was discovered by someone who thought she’d been hit by a car, because her injuries were so severe.

Tragically, Kiya had to be euthanized due to the extent of her injuries. Her final hours were spent being pampered and loved by the staff of the Animal Rescue League of Boston.

Two months later, Czerkawski was arrested after Kiya’s blood splatter was found in the elderly woman’s home. His cell phone records indicated he had bought Kiya from her second owner via a Craigslist ad. He was charged with 12 counts of animal cruelty along with a larceny charge for stealing more than $100,000 from the elderly woman. His trial was originally set for early 2015, but has been repeatedly postponed.

In the meantime, thanks to poor “Puppy Doe,” animal cruelty laws have been strengthened in Massachusetts. The maximum sentence for a first offense, which used to be five years, increased to seven years. Subsequent offenses have a maximum sentence of 10 years. The fines were raised from $2,500 for a first offense to $5,000, and up to $10,000 for subsequent offenses.

“It’s almost like we’re in this period in animal cruelty that’s ‘before Puppy Doe’ and ‘after Puppy Doe,’” Rob Halpin, spokesman for MSPCA-Angell, told the Boston Globe in 2014. “Puppy Doe made a large and permanent crack in the status quo.”

Potential Jurors Asked About Their Opinions of Pit Bulls

Four and a half years after “Puppy Doe” was tortured, selection of the 16-member jury for Czerkawski’s trial in the Norfolk Superior Court began Tuesday. To keep protesters away during the jury selection and trial, a 500-foot buffer zone patrolled by police has been set up around the courthouse. Six Puppy Doe supporters, including Deanna Terminiello, director of the group Pawsitively Puppy Doe, were allowed to sit in the courtroom.

“We don’t want to cause any problems. We do want to follow the judge’s orders. We don’t want to potentially cause a mistrial in this case,” Terminiello told WCVB.

The first day of jury selection, which the Boston Herald called an “arduous” process, 52 prospective jurors were dismissed because they’d either already formed an opinion of the case, were biased about it or had seen pretrial publicity regarding Puppy Doe.

The potential jurors were apparently asked to say something good about Pit Bulls, which really bothers me — did Kiya’s breed have anything to do with the fact that she was tortured? Yet Kiya would probably be alive today if her original owners didn’t have to give her up because of their landlord’s high insurance rates. As I wrote for Care2.com, it’s a sad and very unfair fact that most major insurance companies won’t provide home insurance to owners of Pit Bulls (or Rottweilers, Dobermans or other “dangerous” breeds).

The jury selection process ended Wednesday. “Two of the seven selected jurors own dogs — one of them a puppy,” the Boston Herald reports. “And while remaining silent when afforded the chance to volunteer something good about pit bulls, four later told the court they blame bad owners for bad canine behavior.”

During the selection process, the Boston Herald reports that Czerkawski dozed off, stared into space and barely glanced at the jury pool when told to do so by his attorney, Larry Tipton.

Trial to Last 3 Weeks

The trial is expected to last about three weeks. Opening arguments began this morning, according to the Norfolk District Attorney’s Office. About 50 witnesses are expected to take the stand, including police officers, animal control officers and shelter staff.

“I think it’s going to be horrendous to listen to,” Terminiello told the Boston Herald. “We’ve all been so extremely emotional. It’s caused mental distress for so many. I can’t even tell you how many people have gone through depression and anxiety because of this case, including myself.”

The maximum sentence Czerkawski is facing is 55 years in prison. As Terminiello told WCVB, “You know, it still doesn’t bring her back, but we do get some justice.”

Photo: Animal Rescue League of Boston

PetSmart Employees Apparently OK with Customer Carrying Dog by Collar

Earlier this week, a customer at a PetSmart store in Greenville, N.C., carried his puppy around by its collar, sometimes giving the dangling dog a good shake.

Perhaps taking the saying, “The customer is always right,” way too far, not a single PetSmart employee confronted the man about the abusive way he was carrying his dog.

A photo of the man holding the dog by its collar at the checkout stand is going viral. “He put the dog on the conveyor belt to have the harness rang up,” the caption says.

The photo, taken late Tuesday afternoon, was posted the next day on Facebook by Tammy Mitchell Whaley. An employee told her friend she was afraid to say anything to the man because she feared losing her job if she did so. Whaley called the store manager, who told her he didn’t know why no one reported the incident.

“This is suppose to be a place of business that cares and supports animals?” Whaley wrote.

On Thursday, Sheriff Neil Elks posted the photo on the Pitt County Sheriff Facebook page.

“Thank you for caring about our community and the people and creatures that live here,” he wrote.

“We have gotten other messages from you, the concerned public, and want you to know that this behavior is disturbing to us, as well. Because the location is in Greenville city limits, the sheriff has directed the witness to contact Greenville Animal Control.”

PetSmart has not commented on the photo. If you want to voice your concern, the corporate office can be reached by phone at 888-839-9638 or by filling out this form.

More disturbingly, Elks wrote that his department has “seen several alarming cases recently of animal abuse.”

Photo via Facebook

In California, It’s Legal to Drive with Your Dogs in the Trunk

A driver in South Los Angeles was shocked by what he saw Monday in the car ahead of him: Two Huskies poking their heads out of the partially open trunk.

A cellphone video and photos the driver took and posted on social media got the attention of local media.

When contacted by CBS Los Angeles, the unidentified dog owner said she put the Huskies in the trunk because her children were in the backseat. Besides, she was only driving a short distance, so why not?

Believe it or not, the dogs’ owner committed no crime.

California vehicle code 23117 simply requires that any animal that’s transported on highways in the back of a vehicle “in a space intended for any load” (the trunk or bed of a truck, for instance) to be “either cross-tethered to the vehicle or protected by a secured container or cage, to prevent the animal from falling, jumping, or being thrown from the vehicle.”

The Huskies’ owner used a bungee cord to prevent the trunk door from flying open.

Still, the incident is under investigation by the ASPCA and the LAPD Animal Cruelty Task Force, but representatives from both said it’s unlikely the dogs’ owner will face any charges.

“I believe it’s dangerous to have two dogs back there,” Dr. Richard Polsky, an animal behavior expert, told CBS Los Angeles, and I agree with him (as does the driver who took the photos and the dozens of people who commented on them).

However, Polsky cautioned against jumping to conclusions that this was a case of animal abuse.

“We have to get more facts, you have to get more knowledge about the circumstances in the background of these dogs,” he said.

I would like more knowledge about the background of their owner, who put her dogs in an unsafe, albeit legal, situation. Did she really only do this one time, for a short trip? The dogs appear to be very calm — as if they were used to this strange mode of transportation.

The LAPD Animal Cruelty Task Force told ABC7‘s Marc Cota-Robles it is not recommended to drive with your dog in the truck (duh!), and it could be considered a sign of animal neglect.

But since it’s actually legal, the most the Huskies’ owner will get is a warning.

To save the lives of dogs, it’s time to change California vehicle code 23117 and make the transportation of dogs in trunks, with or without bungee cords, against the law.

Photo via Facebook

Over $14,000 Raised to Help Friendly Dog Shot in Face

When animal control officers responded to a call July 7 about a badly injured dog who’d been dumped from a pickup truck in a Colorado parking lot, they were a little startled by the friendly greeting the dog bestowed upon them.

The dog’s happiness was especially surprising considering the extent of his injury. The officers took the 3-year-old, who appears to perhaps be a Boxer/Pit Bull mix, to the Longmont Humane Society (LHS). An X-ray revealed he had been shot in the face at close range. His jawbone had multiple fractures, and the bullet was still lodged in his jaw.

“This has been probably one of the worst cruelty cases we’ve seen in our area,” Patty Henderson, animal care team supervisor at the LHS, told the Daily Camera. “He has a long road ahead of him.”

‘He Is the Sweetest Big-Headed Goof’

The dog, who was given the name Beefcakes, was transferred to Aspen Meadow Veterinary Specialists (AVMS) in Longmont.

“He came to us after being shot, and never stopped wagging his tail and loving on everyone,” the animal hospital wrote on its Facebook page July 11. “He is the sweetest big-headed goof.”

Beefcakes “was trying to give kisses,” Rachael Landreth, a certified veterinary technician at AMVS, told CBS Denver. “And he was actually trying to crawl up in everyone’s laps.”

Due to the extent of his injuries, as well as broken teeth and a heart murmur discovered during his initial surgery, Beefcakes would need a total of three surgeries. To help cover the costs, LoveAnimals.org, which helps animal nonprofits raise money for critical projects by hosting free crowdfunding campaigns, launched a campaign for Beefcakes.

Ten days later, more than $14,600 had been donated.

“Beefcakes’ story has touched the hearts of animal lovers in Colorado and beyond,” said Sarah Timms, founder of LoveAnimals.org, in a press release. “We were amazed and humbled to see their concern translate into donations for his care.”

Following his third surgery on July 17, Beefcakes has been stable and will soon be recovering in a foster home.

Justice for Beefcakes

After photos of Beefcakes were posted on Facebook, his former owner, who’d called the dog Ice Tee, contacted the Boulder County Sheriff’s Office July 20 and turned in Russell Middleton, who’d been fostering the dog.

Middleton, who has a criminal history, is facing three felony charges and one misdemeanor charge for the shooting. He is due in court on Aug. 27.

Middleton told officers he shot Beefcakes because he’d attacked his girlfriend’s Chihuahua.

When the staff at AVMS heard the news that Beefcakes’ shooter was in custody, “I think tears came to all of our eyes,” Landreth told CBS Denver, choking up again.

“It’s really great to actually see someone get brought to justice for such an atrocity towards an animal.”

Photos via Facebook; Facebook; Boulder County Sheriff’s Office

Monkeys Riding Dogs? Cruel, Not Cute

“The Banana Derby has always been a popular feature within the Fair Industry,” says the front page of the Banana Derby website. “You can’t go wrong spicing up your Fair or Festival with the Banana Derby. America’s Favorite Monkey Jockeys are always Media and Sponsor Friendly, and the Unique nature of the Banana Derby always provides Publicity!”

It’s true that these races, in which capuchin monkeys dressed as jockeys ride atop dogs, are indeed popular. Elephants in circuses and killer whales in theme parks used to be popular, too. But their acceptance by the public has declined as people have become aware of the harm done to these performing animals. Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey announced earlier this year it will stop using elephants in its shows by 2018. Attendance at SeaWorld theme parks has plummeted since the disturbing documentary “Blackfish” was released in 2013.

People are starting to realize that elephants don’t naturally do handstands and killer whales don’t naturally jump through hoops.

But when will people realize that monkeys don’t naturally ride dogs? When the Banana Derby opened at the Lake County Fair in Illinois today, the bleachers were packed with more than 800 spectators.

“I think it’s fun. I think it’s clever,” Michele Longhini, a counselor with the Good Times summer camp, told a Chicago Tribune reporter.

What Longhini may not realize is that, unlike the name of her camp, the Banana Derby provides few good times for its participants. Those cute little capuchin monkeys are chained to the dogs, and struggle to stay upright as they run. Those cute little jockey costumes must get hot and itchy in the middle of summer. Capuchin monkeys naturally belong in trees, not on dogs’ backs and in cramped cages.

That’s right — USDA inspectors have previously found two instances in which Banana Derby’s promoter, Philip Dolci, kept the monkeys in a cage that was smaller than the minimum required size. In another instance, a dog was not securely restrained when being transported, according to the Chicago Tribune.

Dolci insists he takes good care of the animals.

“If I was doing something wrong, the people of Lake County wouldn’t have brought their kids back for six years to see us,” he told UPI. “They say, ‘We see the monkey every year.’ They know the monkey’s name. It’s insanity, really.”

I agree with that last sentence.

Board Members and Animal Experts Don’t Think Monkey Jockeys Are Cute

Two months ago, 16 of the 21 Lake County board members signed a letter opposing the Banana Derby at the county fair.

“We do not feel that paying a vendor to chain monkeys to the backs of dogs, rescue or otherwise, is the kind of attraction that the Lake County Fair should be endorsing,” wrote county board member Sandra Hart in the letter to Jon Brodzik, Jr., president of the Lake County Fair Board.

Also voicing opposition to having the Banana Derby at the Lake County Fair: the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), Chicago zoo associations, animal welfare groups and more than 3,500 petition signers.

Hart told CBS Chicago she feels the Banana Derby “diminishes the value of these animals. When you dress them up in little jockey outfits, and have them running around a ring like that, it kind of exploits those animals.”

The Chicago Zoological Association also sent a letter to the fair board. “The use of primates in this show has serious welfare consequences for the monkeys, poses public health and safety concerns, and may even have consequences for primate conservation,” the association wrote, according to the Chicago Tribune.

Despite these protests from people who know better, the Banana Derby was not cancelled. And for the first time ever, nearby DuPage County will host the Banana Derby at its fair next month.

Also Not Cute: ‘Cowboy Monkeys’

The Banana Derby is not the only company making a profit by exploiting these animals. “Cowboy” capuchin monkeys riding Border Collies make frequent appearances at rodeos and sporting events.

“Although marketed as an ‘amusement’ act, many people find this show offensive and upsetting as they recognize that it is undoubtedly frightening and harmful to the helpless monkeys who may suffer psychological distress and risk serious physical injuries,” writes the HSUS in its fact sheet, “‘Cowboy Monkey’ Acts Are Abusive to Primates.”

Tim Lepard, whose monkeys and dogs perform under the name “Team Ghost Riders,” has been repeatedly cited by the USDA for violating the minimum standards of the federal Animal Welfare Act. According to the HSUS, these citations include “keeping animals in unsanitary conditions, failure to provide adequate crowd management and safety barriers, inadequate shelter, improper food storage, failure to dispose of expired deworming and heartworm preventative medications, and repeatedly being unavailable for animal welfare inspections.”

Nevertheless, last month USA TODAY’s For the Win called the appearance of Team Ghost Riders at a minor league game “the best promotion in baseball.”

Really, USA TODAY?

What do you think — is the Banana Derby and its ilk cute or cruel? Please leave a comment below.

Photos via YouTube; YouTube

Exit mobile version