Padi Is Free! Florida Judge Rules Dog Bite Law Unconstitutional

Share thisShare on Facebook17Tweet about this on TwitterPin on Pinterest0Share on Google+0Share on Reddit0

padi and gartenberg

The holidays just got a lot merrier for Paul Gartenberg, a veterinarian in Brandenton, Fla., and his Black Lab mix, Padi.

In June, Padi bit off part of a 4-year-old’s ear when the boy lunged at the dog, who was hiding under a desk in the office of his owner, veterinarian Paul Gartenberg.

Padi, who’d been rescued from an abusive situation, often stayed under the desk in his “safe spot,” Dr. Gartenberg told the Associated Press.

“This dog was purely acting defensively,” he said. “I can’t think of a dog that wouldn’t have reacted the way Padi did.”

Even so, Manatee County Animal Services took Padi and determined he would have to euthanized under Florida’s “Damage by Dogs” statute. The decision was upheld by a county hearing officer.

Padi’s case sparked global outrage. The Free Padi Facebook community currently has more than 27,400 members.

According to the Damage by Dogs law, if a dog who has not been labeled as “dangerous” bites someone deeply enough to require stitches or reconstructive surgery — even if that someone provoked the dog or happens to be a murderous intruder inside your home — the dog must be confiscated and euthanized.

That’s right — the state that was first to enact a controversial “Stand Your Ground” law, which protects humans who defend themselves against real or perceived threats, does not extend that protection to most dogs.

Today Judge Andrew Owens decided the law is unconstitutional, and set Padi free, clearing the dog “of any type of death sentence, for lack of a better word,” Charles Britt, the attorney for Gartenberg, told WWSB.

“(The statute) results in an unconstitutional delegation of discretion in animal control authorities insofar as the statute provides animal control authorities no guided authority to select the severity of consequences for a dog’s actions,” the judge ruled, according to the Brandenton Herald.

“The Court finds it illogical and inconsistent that an owner of a dog facing a dangerous dog investigation and classification under (the dangerous dog law) may assert certain defenses such as provocation, defense of a family member or person from an unjustified attack, but an owner of a dog subjected to the provisions of (the severe dog bite statute) enjoys no such defenses, notwithstanding the statute’s constitutional validity, to prevent that statutory mandated execution of their dog.”

Florida Rep. Greg Steube also thinks the law is unfair, and has introduced a bill (HB91) that would save the lives of dogs who bite only to protect themselves or their family members, or bite someone who is trespassing.

“Most people don’t realize that the statute is so black and white,” Steube told 10 News. “If a dog does this damage and it causes this type of injury they have to be euthanized. I thought it was absurd when I read the law.”

If passed, the new law would allow all pet parents due process, giving them the opportunity to explain the circumstances of a biting incident. A hearing officer would then decide whether the dog should be euthanized.

The bill has been passed unanimously by two committees so far. Steube told 10 News he hopes it makes its way to Gov. Rick Scott’s desk by January.

In the meantime, Manatee County Animal Services has been ordered to no longer enforce the Damage by Dogs statute and to close any pending cases in which the law was said to have been broken.

A staff member at Gartenberg’s veterinary clinic told the Brandenton Herald the vet couldn’t talk at the moment, but was “ecstatic.”

Photo via Facebook